I’ve heard Christians present the work Jesus did on the cross as follows.  Imagine you’ve been convicted of some crime, let’s say rape.  You go to court and the Judge finds you guilty and gives you life in prison.  Then all of a sudden, this person (who happens to be God) named Jesus jumps into the room and says, “I’ll serve the time for this guilty man.  Let him go free.”  Jesus pays the price, and the guilty man goes away with his guilt wiped away and he is supposed to be so grateful for what Jesus has done for him that he follows him with joy for the rest of his life, never raping again.  Of course, if he does happen to rape again (which we’re told is likely to happen), Jesus will be there again to pay the penalty.

I find this a perfectly horrific picture of a God.  To be fair, I don’t think the people who use this “paid the price” analogy really mean exactly this, but that’s what it appears to me to boil down to.

What good has this done?  Is the rapist any better off?  Is the judge satisfied?  What about the girl he raped?

I hope it’s obvious that any just judge would not allow such a simple substitution.  I hope it’s clear that this “mercy” on the guilty man will probably do him more harm than good.  I most certainly hope it is clear that the rape victim is still a rape victim.

The rapist is guilty of rape, not life in prison.  The guilt of the rapist is that he has violated and abused an innocent girl.  If the man goes away satisfied that the “price has been paid” because Jesus is serving his time, then this man has no concept of what he has actually done, he has no love for God or for the girl he raped.  He has no remorse, and any god that comes down and “lets him off the hook” is an unjust, horrible god.

Let’s try to fix up the picture a bit, though it is not a perfect analogy for Christ’s work on the cross.

We have the same situation of rapist, judge (who is God, btw) and victim.  The verdict is guilty but the sentence is to right the wrong that has been done.  “How can I do that?” asks the rapist.  “That is impossible.”  Perhaps the judge answers “You must labor until you can pay your debts.  You have a debt and you must pay.”  Now the state of the rapist is one of desperation with the true price of his sin before him.  I hope his desperation comes from knowing the poor girl he raped can never be made whole rather than that he will never be able to pay his debts.

This time Jesus enters and says “My beloved rapist.”  “You have committed a great crime and justice must be served.  Yet I know your helplessness and I have heard your cries and have had mercy on you.”  To the girl he turns and makes her whole.  He restores her to a state of innocence as pure as before the horrible rape.  We cannot pictures this, but God can and will redeem all things.  Then Jesus turns to the rapist and gives him a new name.  “You are no longer a rapist.  You are a son of God.  Go, follow the Lord with all your heart and no longer take from others that which you cannot repay!”

What joy for the rapist!  His victim is HEALED!  What joy for this son of God, he now serves a just, merciful, loving God!  What joy for this son of God, he is free from his impossible, eternal burden and is now free to do good work for his Lord.  What joy for this son of God, he serves a God who knows the human condition and is ever there to help him towards what is good, what is holy, and what is beautiful.

This is not the whole picture, nor is it a perfect analogy, but it fits the salvation story much better than the first.

All praise to our just, merciful, loving God!  AMEN!

Posted by harp on Sunday, March 18, 2007 at 2:37 am | Edit
Permalink | Read 216 times
Category Walk with the Lord: [first] [previous] [next] [newest]
Comments
Ahhh, this deserves a more thought-out response, but I know from experience that if I wait till I have time, it might never happen. So let me just say that C. S. Lewis also wrestled with the punitive substitution idea and also came to the conclusion that it makes no sense, at least as popularly explained. As I recall he leaned toward "paid the price" as being more like paying someone else's debt, because a debt is something that can be paid for another. The beauty of your analogy is that it goes further in exploring how vast that "debt" might be. What good does it do for me to be "forgiven" if the one I've damaged is still broken? The glib explanation that "all sins are really against God" is no help, since true as that may be, they are not only against God. God will redeem all things is the most joyous hope there is!

Posted by sursumcorda on Sunday, March 18, 2007 at 11:21 am
Ummm, yes, there are SO many problems with the first scenario presented. For one thing, it addresses *mercy* without addressing *grace*. We're not simply "off the hook"--escaped punishment by the skin of our teeth, now get out before he changes his mind--we have all of Christ's righteousness *imputed* to our account (wait, am I repeating myself from a couple of days ago?). So no, it's not just a punishment model. That's why a human justice system can never be anything more than a standby measure--"an eye for an eye" doesn't give the victim back his eye anymore than an animal sacrifice negates Old Testament sin. It's not just "mankind sins, Christ dies, God calls it even"; it's "mankind sins, Christ lives a sinless life for him," and we're *restored.* *** BUT--both scenarios are missing one key facet. Yes, humans sin against humans. But that's not what's primarily on trial. It's not a courtroom scene of defendant, judge, and victim--*the judge is the victim.* All crimes against other people are secondary to the charge of our sin *against God.* The primary damage was damage to God's glory--to his claim of being just and holy while allowing sin to exist. And it was that damage that, yes, was repaired at the cross. I like your idea that wrongs that can't be restored by the hand of human justice will be redeemed somewhere and somewhen (maybe in the new heaven and the new earth?), but the most pressing injustice has already been righted.

Posted by Andy Bonner on Sunday, March 18, 2007 at 12:21 pm
Thanks for your comments, Andy. I wish we'd spent more time talking in college. You're absolutely right that there are many more problems with the scenario than I brought up. The second is missing some very important stuff. It only attempts to correct some false impressions about God. I am unable to find an analogy that incorporates all the aspects of God's character! Hm, I wonder why . . .

Posted by IrishOboe on Sunday, March 18, 2007 at 1:40 pm
cudos to Andy and to Janet! I should have been reading the blogs much earlier! My apologies and love to you, Janet. Please pray for my brother, Dickie, his relationship (or more appropriately - lack there of) with our Lord is questionable but he is standing in the need of prayer. He had an 8+hr. surgery a week ago this past Tuesday. Removed his bladder, some of his colo/rectal areas, moved his ostomy site because of a hernia, and cleaned up other tissues surrounding where he had radiation treatment for prostate cancer. He has still not eaten since before the surgery...and other complications. love and miss you lil sis Auntie Pami

Posted by Auntie Pami on Friday, March 30, 2007 at 10:32 pm
Hi Auntie Pami! Thanks for stopping by! I will keep Dickie in my prayers. Love ya'!

Posted by IrishOboe on Saturday, March 31, 2007 at 2:54 am
Add comment