So just what goes through the mind the day before an audition that will determine the course of your life? Lucky for me I have no idea. God determines the course of my life and he has given me a great peace today. Even before I played a great run-through for CY I envisioned what would happen if I was not accepted and I went home with no immediate plans to come back to Basel, and I was fine with it. My imagination still works well and I really thought about the details and I pictured returning home and waiting for the next direction from God. I could imagine a few situations that would be exciting and fulfilling and I know God has even better plans in store. I’m writing this not to tell you that I no longer want to come back, but mostly so that if I am not accepted, rereading it will remind me of the peace and trust I had in God today. I have to admit I didn’t really picture the goodbye part, but could imagine pressing onward to a new work.
As things stand now I am confident that my pieces are a good representation of what I can do and that I will be accepted, but I have peace with another outcome. It is odd, usually I have no confidence in my ability and only the slightest hope that I will ‘win’ the audition and this low expectation has always served to cushion the fall and so mask how much I want it. It was a way of curbing my excitement about the future in favor of protecting my ego at the moment. This time, however, I feel very excited about the prospect of coming back to the Schola, BCF, and Basel. I have lots of great ideas and hopes and it’s an exciting road that I desire to walk down! Yet at the same time, the thought of giving it all up does not cause distress. I am ready to give up the good gifts the Lord has given me and follow in the path of His choosing, knowing full well that His path is the best path. I must say I rather like having passion and eagerness for something at the same time that I hold it lightly. It is worlds better than refusing to feel in order to avoid being hurt.
Now I will hijack my own post and say that because I was so at peace, after the proper practice and preparation I sat down to a book and now have the burden to write about it. It made me so mad I nearly threw it across the room, but it was not my book. I then told myself “I should get so upset about it” and instantly I was sitting calming looking simply at so much ink and paper. I’m not sure what makes me a passionate person, but it was bazaar to have my passion disappear so quickly. I have no interpretation for you at the moment.
The content that sent me raving is still a matter of concern to me, but hopefully I don’t need to rant about it. The book I was reading at up to that point been moderately helpful. I have a decent amount of respect for Dr. James Dobson, and Life on the Edge caught my eye. I don’t find it the most insightful of books nor brimming with timeless truths, but I suspect that’s not the point of a book meant to help foolish teens through their transition years. (I’m 25 and so just on the age limit for reading the book. Maybe that should have been my first clue.)
Unfortunately, in writing I did go into a rant, but I can’t seem to write about it other than in a sarcastic way. Have patience, or skip.
The chapters on marriage made me nearly forget his good advice in previous chapters on seeking first the kingdom of heaven. I thought Dobson was a wise family man but his advice on dating – oh, excuse me, courting leaves me cold (or hot, depending). What’s the secret to true intimacy in a world of divorce and fear? Well, Mr. Researcher has found the answer: step methodically through stages of physical intimacy, but not too fast. Wow, good to know marriage is all about sex. I suppose I misunderstood the purpose of his progression “eye to body,” “eye to eye,” “voice to voice,” “hand to hand,” “hand to shoulder,” “hand to waste,” you get the picture. He’s not saying that’s what finding a partner is all about, just that’s a good way to become physically intimate when the time comes. Sadly, the example he gives proves that hopeful theory or misinterpretation wrong. He tells the fairy tale story of how he met his wife (proof positive it’s the best way to do things!). He saw her sitting across the cafeteria (eye to body) and she saw him looking at her (eye to eye) and they exchanged flirtation glances (how godly). Some days later (taking it slowly, obviously) she spoke to him: “Hi Mr. Legs” (voice to voice). Impressive. He was taken in by it. Later (again, he’s so wise for letting time pass) he gets a date by some stupid trick with a coin. The rest is history, well almost. He does go on to say that he doesn’t believe in love at first sight and that all such stories do not end in happy marriages, but it is terribly irresponsible of him to present this as his only example. It sets up false expectations for a romantic, physical-attraction-first way to meet your spouse. Just go through the intimacy steps slowly and you’ll build a good marriage. And just how do you go slowly? He gives two lines to the answer: chit-chat. I’m sorry, but when someone I love has his hand on my shoulder and it moves to my waste (it’s okay, that’s within the sequence) the last thing on my mind is stopping to chit-chat. Oh, and the last few steps should be saved for after marriage, but if you’re used to steadily progressing through these ‘intimacy steps’ then how do you put on the breaks? It’s just not practical or wise advice in my mind. Steven Covey gives far more inspiring and practical advice in 7 Habits (I believe) when he talks about how he and his wife continually become more intimate in their conversation and work through issues and reconcile differences in a loving and beautiful way. Plus the principles apply to all relationships! It’s closer to what True Love is all about!
The next chapter sounds good but is nearly as empty. Love must be tough, and by that Dobson means don’t love too much. If you feel you’re loosing your man don’t run after him and make him feel trapped, but allow him his freedom and trust him and your love will grow together. I understand his point, but it could be made in a paragraph and not a whole chapter. He takes a long time to explain that it’s no fun being followed by a whipped puppy dog and girls like the challenge of a guy who is hard to get (and vice versa). Without questioning whether it is a good or bad thing to be bored with devotion, his advice is to step back. Again, I feel like most of his advice is anti-advice: don’t move too quickly, don’t suffocate your partner, don’t move in before marriage, don’t marry too early, don’t marry to quickly, don’t, don’t, don’t. Fine, he’s right, but what DO we do? Believe me, I agree that physical intimacy should progress slowly and is an important part of leading toward marriage. I’m the first to admit that having someone so totally in love with you that he follows you around like a puppy dog is a big turn off, but isn’t there something more? Maybe I’m a stuck-up, unfeeling, hormone-less, holier-than-thou gal, but I am not impressed by early declarations of attraction, flirting, and pick-up lines. Frankly, I’m tired of them. Or maybe I’m a hormone-filled, emotional, desperate gal, but the problem is not finding someone I’m attracted to but finding someone I respect and with whom I connect on many levels (maybe that’s because I’m full of so much randomness). Finding a true friendship is difficult. Getting the hormones going is not. I don’t see the road to a healthy marriage paved with Hollywood romance. Great if it happens that way, but come on, how often does it work that way? I wonder how much time Dobson spent flirting with pretty girls and thinking of pick-up lines rather than serving God.
Dobson also says that nearly every relationship goes through a “break-up” phase where one person wants out and they either survive after a break or split forever. To me that’s a sign that the relationship was rushed in the first place. Why on earth is that necessary? What would Jesus say if he read those chapters? I think he would be totally confused. What happened to my father’s beautiful gift of marriage? This does not mirror my relationship to the church!
I really hope I misinterpreted it all and I really hope there are guys out there who don’t buy into it (okay, just one and that he finds me). What I hope more is that there are books with a better vision for how God can guide two souls from being strangers to becoming one. I could look for them, but I’ll avoid the problem of getting mad at dating books by not picking any more up . . .
Sorry this post isn’t cohesive and I still sound mad. I’m not mad, but I am frustrated. This coming from the big family man who is guiding Christian youth! It matters! We should not look like the world! We should not simply be a ‘no’ to the world’s way. I’m sure I’m too opinionated, and as a friend said when listening to me talk about my vision of family life “and where do you bend?” Aye, there’s the crux of it. Can I bend in matters of importance? I’d like to think so, but it’s a question I need to take seriously before thinking I can be a wife.
One thing is for sure, it is all in God’s hands. He is my teacher and guide. Praise the Lord!
One last random thought. I wish I would save my passion for what the Lord is passionate about. I can get so passionate about something relatively unimportant. So what if I disagree with Dobson’s dating advice? I lost the need to rant in that moment after realizing I didn’t need to be angry, but I still chose to write about it and I can’t exactly say I was calm. We really don’t want to be rid of our sins do we?
That's quite all right. I like to see someone who is passionate about something other than passion. ;) Ideas matter, and if you're anything like me -- and I know you are in some ways -- writing is a great help in thinking about them.
How do you know the Lord isn't passionate about dating advice? "Let not many of you become teachers, my brethren, for you know that we who teach shall be judged with greater strictness."
I let myself get hijacked, too. :) I'm so glad you are at peace. When is your audition? Morning? Afternoon?
Since your imagination still works well, imagine a great big hug from me to you!
Dear Lord, please be with Janet tonight and tomorrow. Grant her peaceful slumber and restful dreams. She is precious to You and there is no dream planted in her heart whose outcome is not infinitely more valuable to you. Keep her secure in your peace and focused on your praise. Bless her audition with grace and joy, that she might make a joyful noise to you and continue to trust that the result is in your hands. Touch also the ears of the judges, that she be heard as you intend. Thank you, Father, for your unfolding plans for your daughter's life.
Amen.
I was moved almost to laugh out loud. Your perspective on your own performance is so rare, Janet; you know, that, right? To write about "Night Before The Audition Thoughts," and have it be something other than the neurotic panic—I don't need to tell you about that; you were at the same school. You know, it almost seems like sometimes you worry that you're not any more worried than you are? Well, don't; your first response of freedom and trust is right on the money. (I almost said your "natural" response, but changed it—that doesn't come naturally!)
As for the rest of the post—oofdah! you do know how to start discussions, don't you? I'm gonna have to make that a whole 'nother comment. And it'll take awhile, believe me.
So in the meantime, let me just second Brenda's beautiful prayer above. It can't possibly be improved upon. You play "as unto the Lord." I praise God for the peace he gives you (in comparison with the world, a bizarre peace, truly "passing understanding); I hope you do too!
Of all the people on this blog I think you, Andy can understand the pre-audition thing the best. You hit the nail on the head. I did spend a lot of time at Eastman worrying that I didn't care enough! And you're right, it doesn't come naturally to break free of that cycle. It's so good to have so many different friends that deeply understand one or another part of me. (Maybe as you write your longer response to the dating issues I'll finish my longer response to your Desiring God comment.)
Most importantly, THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRAYERS! They are beautiful and perfect. Most of all and not surprising given the God that we serve, they are working and are deeply felt. I have peace and I'm excited to play today. I still have some jitters, but that's fine. I will report to my faithful blog community as soon as I can! (The Audition is 2:30-3pm Swiss time.)
Are you at GMT +2? or six hours ahead of EST? (If so, then you're playing in something like 15 minutes!)
Yes, Eastern Time +6, except when our Daylight Saving Times are out of sync.
It's over! The only problem with not being stressed before is that you don't get that great sense of relief afterward. It's a fair trade-off. I did not do my best, but I did as well as I could expect given the situation. They got a good idea of who I am and how I play. It was conducted almost entirely in German. I hope that helps. From the conversation it seems like the question is what program and how to fit me in, not whether I can come or not, but I'll wait for the official word before I celebrate too much. I should write it up in an update and not a comment, but I wanted to thank you for your prayers. They're still discussing it, so if you wouldn't mind praying that they will come up with the option that fits our needs best, I'd appreciate it! I'm now on my last ten days. Vacation time! Er, I have to make reeds and shop and deregister and clean up and pack and . . . I'm going to eat something then help Catharine with cleaning the school. Update coming your way soon!
Thanks for the news. We'll keep praying. Looking forward to the official update.
Ya send a kid to a Japanese school for a year, and she can't get out of the school-cleaning habit. Maybe it's related to washing dishes. ;)
I would love to talk more about the Dobson stuff sometime. I confess I am not a fan of his...but I have read the book you are talking about and also Love Must Be Tough. I was frustrated by them both as well for many of the same reasons.
Congrats on your audition and I look forward to seeing what God will do next!!!
Just heard the news: I'm in! No details other than I did terrible on the sigh reading, but that's what happens with a new instrument that you mostly play by ear with. Thanks for all the support! I'm using the school computer to write, so I better get back to work. Love ya! Wow, another few years in Europe studying early music. God is so generous!!!
CONGRATULATIONS!
What I find amusing is that sight reading was always your great strength, from the time you were five or six years old. That's why I roll my eyes when people insist Suzuki students can't read well. Maybe it just takes 20 years or so to take effect....
I firmly believe in and support the right of the writer in question to rant about whatever she wants. As such, I wasn't going to touch the book commentary because I have enough faith to believe you.
However, on further pondering, how is it that we wind up following dogma? Someone will present an argument that seems right or sensible, and certainly pleases some ears, and we swallow it. How does that happen? I haven't read Life on the Edge, so I'm going on what you said. For some unfathomable reason, humans like a standardized checklist.
Why is that? Why do we take anything around us - faith, school, how to eat cereal, almost anything - and demand a rubber stamp? Maybe there are people out there who don't do that, but people seem to have such a strong compulsion to make "average" into "normal".
I don't doubt that Dobson has a nice, normal relationship with his wife that is backed up by lots and lots of research and statistics. He probably even found a method that most people go through. But who's to say that's right or normal or even important? If God really did make all of us unique, isn't it to be expected that our obedience to His plans for our lives would result in unique stories?
1) You could have thrown that book as long as you didn't knock anything over or dent the apartment. I haven't cracked it open in ten years. And I don't know that I will just so I can be Dobson's advocate because I feel you're overreaching. It almost sounds like you're afraid of your own passion. But all that's a discussion that can be saved up for later.
2) I am quite sure that nobody will ever want to move his hand to your waste. Quite sure.
3) Your waist is a different matter. Somebody will want to, and what's he to do? Write an ode to your waist as a means of asking permission without it being totally awkward?
How do I love thee? Let me hold thy waist
That blessed minimum of outline curve
Let my indulgence be but brief and chaste
And not to greater pleasures outwards swerve
How do I love thee? Let me hold thy waist
Circumference reduced o'er swelling hip
Let not that supple locus go to waste
Or miss its purpose: to give better grip
4) Anyway, your post did answer my own prayers twofold: before your Dobson blindside, by recounting your calmness, and in the comments, by relating your acceptance. Congratulations, and I'm glad you'll be back!
5) It was nice to find out the time of the audition and realize that even though I didn't pray until on the outbound train for the airport at 8:30, I wasn't late. So often I pray after the fact, but before knowing the results, and wonder what God does with the prayers of the forgetful.
"Li’l Yapper Guy" my foot! He's a poet! I'm glad you disciplined his "lazy self" and got this one into print. I laughed so hard I certainly had my internal exercise for the day, as Janet's grandmother used to say. I still laugh when I think of "Quite sure."
I certainly laughed quite hard as well, though it had to be suppressed because Noah is nursing to sleep. I was wondering if maybe some bariatric doctor someday might want to...
I certainly hope she never has any need for a bariatric doctor, but with all her traveling, there might someday be, say, a tropical disease specialist who is interested. Dad certainly piqued their interest after his summer in Bangladesh.
Glad to have been of service. Of course, the word "blessed" has two syllables in this context. It could have become a sonnet, but I've forgotten the exact rhyme pattern and I wrote it on the quick in the airport hotel, so I didn't want to have to come up with six more lines.
Not so glad as to the topic I started off, but it happens.
And another thing that hit me later: I'm quick to congratulate, but also quick to forget that while you deserve congratulations for the fruit of hard work, before the audition we were all talking about God and how he will work and about doing his will, so thank you, Father, for what you've done and graciously given, for the prayers heard and the new avenues opened for Janet.
Yapper's been temporarily tamed again: Mizzouse in da Hizzouse. That said, I wouldn't equate posting on the internet with publishing.
