This has been the busiest week yet of being out all day running for event to event.  I’d complain about being tired, but who could have pity on someone with a schedule full of dancing, playing, concerts, and meetings with incredible people?

The week began early on Monday morning when I went with the family at 7am to drop Tamino off at the crèche so they would know my face for when I pick Tamino up alone.  After that I went right to German class, which put me there an hour early and was just enough time to finish my homework for the weekend.  German classes this week went well for the most part, though I wish I’d skipped so I could attend more of the Improvisation and Dance Fest workshops.  I usually scraped by doing my homework at odd points.  It seems to be working still, though my vocabulary is building slowly.  We learned the Genitive case today and it wasn’t nearly as terrible as I thought it would be.  Enough of that.

The Improvisation and Dance Fest was all day Monday, Tuesday and Friday, with most of the dance workshops happening in the morning.  I was able to attend the last hour of the Renaissance dance class on Monday, but Tuesday I had a meeting and Wednesday I had a harp lesson!  Luckily most of the dances we’d done in our Wednesday evening classes so I was able to remember them for the Tuesday evening Ball-abend, which I already wrote about here

On Monday afternoon there was a very interesting workshop, though I couldn’t understand much of the German.  The same piece was played in different ways by an alta capella (three shawms and a sackbut), then lutes and fidel, then a hand organ (I don’t know the name!).  The hand organ was so beatufiul!

I did manage to get home that day to practice for the performance Tuesday and to get ready for the “dance evening.”  I had no idea if I was dancing or playing so I brought shoes and instrument just in case.  I’ve been paranoid about not being prepared since I misunderstood my role in the ball-abend.  Turns out it was a gorgeous evening of Renaissance dances performed in costume by the pros.  It was so beautiful!  Some of the musicians and many of the dancers came from France and elsewhere and they were really good.  Renaissance dance might not be too showy (though the boys do get to show off their fancy steps and big jumps), but it’s endlessly fascinating.  Besides the fact that I love the music, the dance is interesting to watch in terms of social interaction.  If what I’ve been told about the period is right, dancing was the only proper place for men and woman to interact and interact they did!  Much of the improvised part of the dances (yes, within the structure there is much freedom to improvise) were all about flirty and showing off!  The women couldn’t lift their skirts to show how agile they were, but they sure could be coy in a wonderfully flirtatious way.  Now, I usually don’t enjoy watching people flirt, much less being on the receiving end of it (boys can be so mean when they like you), but somehow this older, more refined flirting was fascinating to watch.  It was done with a look, a turn of the head, a moment’s hesitation before beginning the dance step that brought the couple back together.

Here's a video of students dancing.  Watch for the first part, which is has certain steps, and then the second part, which is improvised ('men' first then ladies).

2007-03-19 Renais. dance fest all dancing set and improv.mpg

The lovely performance ended surprisingly just in time for me to run over to Martinskirche for a performance by All’ Improvviso.  It was absolutely amazing.  I loved nearly every minute of it and I just couldn’t get over the energy and skill of the musicians.  The whole concert was improvisation over rather simple baselines and forms.  I don’t know enough to know exactly what, but I did recognize the Folia, and one other that had been done (or would soon be done, I can’ remember when I heard it) for the Improvisation and Dance Fest.  For some this might be boring, but I love the sound am a melody person anyway, so listening to them improvise was endlessly fascinating.  I don’t know how to classify their music.  I heard they are all graduates of the Schola, but they certainly weren’t doing a purely historical performance, and it had a lot of more recent Italian songs (not pop, but more like folk).  It was just beautiful, creative music coming from a harpsichord, a hammered dulcimer-type instrument, theorbe, guitars, percussion (hand drums, tambourines, etc.), violin, cornets, clarinets, voice, and more.  Amazon says its pop music.  Could be.  I forgot to mention the double bass.  It certainly had rock, but without microphones and in an old church it was a great sound!  The only part of the evening I could have done without was the crazy dancer.  Later she did some neat dancing, but the first few dances looked like my Italian teacher with her long frizzy black hair going nuts on stage.  If you’ve seen Nell (don’t go out it and watch if you haven’t) it reminded me of Nell walking into the pool table room and spinning around with her dress lifted up over her head.  This dancer didn’t show her chest, but she sure revealed her underwear (Irish dancers like to do that too) and she was just flailing her limbs around (her hair counts as a limb in this case, too) and jumping and rolling and, well, going crazy.  Of course, the part that made her really crazy was that she was dancing barefoot. ;)

I bought a CD and I’m listening to it now.  I’m pleased that there are many of the same pieces!  I can’t get over how beautiful the cornets are!  At the end one singer had us join her.  She’d improvise a short phrase and we’d imitate.  Think of a stone church with high ceilings and five or six hundred audience members who know a thing or two about music.  Can you imagine what it will be like to sing with the heavenly hosts!!!!  And there won’t be fights about musical styles either. ;)

I went home exhausted, but what wonderful experiences!  The Europeans might have socialist governments and a lot less freedom, but they sure have creativity and the arts!  Does it have to be that way?

Wednesday I had my first harp lesson.  I still can’t believe that I get to study with one of the great early music harpists!  It was a good lesson despite the fact that I’m out of practice, but now I have an instrument to practice on!  I went to the instrument library to pay for the harp rental and walked out with three more instruments: two medieval recorders and a fidel.  Fidel is the medieval violin/viola/cello (nothing was standardized back then).  I finally got a chance to play them today and it’s such fun!  I’m like a kid in a candy store.  My ten years of violin experience is coming back to help me.  I don’t know how to hold the fidel or tune it, but I was given the advice to hold it the way it felt comfortable and to tune it the way I felt it fit the instrument and me best.  What a way to teach an instrument.  At the risk of teaching the “think system” I’d think it’s a good idea for modern instruments as well.  One of the recorders has a gorgeous sound, but it’s pitched at A=460 (most Baroque players play at 415, medieval at 440 or 460).  I figured out some fingering (I haven’t worked out the upper register yet) and spent time improvising a melody since I was inspired by the tone of the instrument.  Now if only I understood the harmonic structure behind the tunes I make up and be able to make up a tune on a harmonic structure . . .

I hope I don’t bore you with these details.  I remember dreaming as a kid of a public instrument library where you could go try out instruments, get a little starting help, take them home for a while, experiment, and then try another one or continue if you really cliqued with an instrument.  It is assumed that you need to become really good at one instrument, though secondary instruments are common and helpful.  I question that basic assumption.  Do all musicians need to function this way?  Sure, if you want the best orchestra you want people who really specialize in one instrument and then you can do great things, but how many musicians and places can afford such large, specialized groups?  Maybe with recordings the idea of being a versatile musician is impractical, but I think if you’re going to spend all this time and energy getting to know an era of music you might as well learn a thing or two about the other instruments.  What if I want to open a music school that has an early music ensemble?  I want to be able to find instruments and give basic instruction on all the instruments.  Band directors supposedly have that sort of training, but most education programs only give a week or so of instruction on each instrument and require a great deal of work in a specialized instrument.  Why?  It’s like saying you can’t be linguist unless you know one language really well and others only moderately if you feel like it because it’s not practical to be good in many languages.  Well, I quite playing other instruments before when “important” people told me I needed to focus and I was miserable.  I’m not doing it again!  I’ll let the time be the judge this time.

So, after another day of workshops the festival ended, but we still had dance class that night!  It was a joy as always even if I was tired.  Now I had a model for how a polished dance looks in costume and entertained myself by trying to imitate their elegant moves rather than just get through the steps of the dance.  I’d concentrate on my posture and gestures then forget the next step . . .

I then went to a student Baroque oboe concert and it was very impressive.  I loved how he played the oboe da caccia (English horn).  Inspiring!

Though the fest was over, Thursday was just as busy.  I skipped the first half of German class for harp studio class and there were only two of us so it was like another private lesson!  Pinch me, I’m dreaming!  While waiting for the Indian modal improvisation class I finally went to the library to figure out how to find and check out CDs.  After wading through some German I managed to do it and will no be addicted to their great collection.  I felt less in control of the material in Indian class today, but I think I understood our homework assignment . . .

I had my first meeting with Crawford Young and was not disappointed.  He did a really great job of talking to my level.  He receives my questions well answering them clearly and without judgment.  I will learn so much from him since I feel free to ask “stupid” questions like “what’s an alta capella?” and “Who is Landini?” (though I’m sure I studied him in school).  Mostly it wasn’t trivial conversation, though.  We listened to recordings, looked a original notation and various transcriptions, discussed possible interpretations and he showed me how to access manuscripts from various sources for research purposes.  My personal challenge this week is to go to the university library and figure out how to use the microfiche machine to copy original works – I never have!  How can I be a college graduate without knowing how to use a library?  I hope I find a helpful librarian who will fall for it when I play the “dumb American” card.  There are some advantages to being a foreigner, and I think being a girl helps as well . . .

Full of ideas from our meeting we both rushed off to a concert of medieval music by schola students.  This was in another beautiful, though much smaller church.  It was so beautiful!  It was mostly vocal, but some pieces had fidel, harp, flute, or hurdy-gurdy (I’ve always loved that instrument and it was played so well!).  I have to admit I suddenly wanted to rent a flute and hurdy-gurdy as well . . .

I’m not sure I’m totally sold on the style of singing, but it was gorgeous.  I love the pure tones with very little vibrato and the endless circling and twisting and tangling of lines.  Wow!  Five amazing concerts in one week.  I never attended such a series at Eastman.  Argh!  I’ve got to find a way to stay here longer!

Even though I got home at 8pm it took most of the evening just to review and organize what I need to do to prepare for the next lessons and classes.  Friday I’ve had the whole afternoon to try to catch up and plan my parent’s visit next week, but after practicing three instruments and blabbering about the long week the day has disappeared as quickly as any other.  Congratulations for making it to the end of this post.  You are a die hard Janet fan!  “Christ in hearts of all that love me.”  God bless!

Posted by harp on Friday, March 23, 2007 at 4:20 pm | Edit
Permalink | Read 523 times
Category Switzerland Adventure: [first] [previous] [next] [newest]
Comments
It sounds like you're absolutely glutting on sights & sounds! I'm glad. If I regret anything about Eastman, I just wish I had done more, especially in opportunities that I wouldn't have elsewhere. Gone to even more concerts, gotten involved in more groups. *** I like your instrumental-multilingualism idea. I certainly don't practice it much, but that's mainly because I haven't had that much access to random instruments (and because, although it's not how I like to think of myself, I actually get discouraged pretty easily with not being able to express myself fluently on them). *** Oh, DO try the hurdy-gurdy!! What an instrument! Fun to look at, fun to play, and doubly fun to play. And it gets points in my book for being close kin to my all-time favorite instrument, the nyckelharpa (www.nyckelharpa.org). Ooh, if you have access to a nyckelharpa, promise you'll try it just for me!

Posted by Andy Bonner on Friday, March 23, 2007 at 5:43 pm
What an absolute delight to read!

Posted by sursumcorda on Friday, March 23, 2007 at 9:37 pm
Freedom: another topic to earmark for discussion.

Posted by Stephan on Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 6:56 am
Ooo - I wish you'd discuss it here! I'd love to get an insider's view on the issue.

Posted by sursumcorda on Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 7:05 am
I wish I had the time! My basic thought is that Americans and Europeans have a different concept of freedom, to the point that for a European America does not necessarily appear freer. -- An example: I drove down the California coast near Big Sur once and thought how much fun it'd be to hike up one of those spurs and explore that part of the country. My second thought was that I couldn't, because the land belonged to someone and I'd be trespassing. -- Another example (hyberbole alert): Although there seem to exist infinite possibilities in America, half of them are possibilities of you getting sued for making avail of the other half of those possibilities. In the end, Americans won't make use of their freedom because of the fear of litigation. I think - I'm not certain - that, as a measure to prevent people from abusing their freedom, America chose to add the freedom to litigate rather than curtail individual freedom. It's come to where people abuse this additional freedom and there's nothing to be done. -- Another example: Europeans are much freer to choose to live without a car.

Posted by Stephan on Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 3:06 pm
I can't say I understood all of what you said, though I'm sure Europeans have a different view of freedom, I'm not sure yet what it is. Americans differ in their views quite a bit as well. Is the California example a comment on personal property? I also think that in general Americans are not spending their time worrying about getting sued. Maybe businesses are, but it's the stupid cases that make it to the news. Are Europeans actually "freer" to choose to live without a car or is it just that it's easier to make that choice? I'm not sure I see the availability of alternate transportation as a freedom issue, as much as I love European public transportation.

Posted by IrishOboe on Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 3:35 pm
I think we're running into definition issues here, at least in part.
If I am free to choose [A] or [B], but choosing [B] is made significantly harder, does that change my degree of freedom?
I would argue yes, it does: the harder [B] becomes, the closer we get to taking option [B] away altogether, at which point freedom is lost for this particular choice.
But I can also see why someone would say, no, the freedom of choice is not affected, only the implementation of that choice - except that I think this view makes freedom a make-believe thing dissociated from freedom as phenomenologically evident.

Posted by Stephan on Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 4:52 pm
I'll echo Stephan -- I wish I had the time! I'll have to keep thinking about this, and in the meantime give out little pieces of thought instead of a coherent argument, even if it makes Li'l Writer Guy squirm. Working backwards, I agree that making [B] very difficult entails a de facto loss of freedom, if not de jure. A good example in the U.S. would be our public school system. Public school is not mandatory. Schooling -- I was going to say "education," but it's attendance that's required, not learning -- schooling is compulsory, but you can meet the requirement through public, private, or home schools. That's the law. In practice, however, so much money is poured into the public school system that it's very difficult to choose otherwise. Public schools have vast resources, supported not only by the government (taxes) but also by corporations and foundations. It takes a lot of money, or a lot of determination, or both, for a family to choose the double taxation of paying for public schools and then paying again for private or home education. We are legally free to choose whatever we believe to be the best way to educate our children -- and I'm not minimizing the importance of that critical human right -- but practically speaking the choice is heavily weighted.

Posted by sursumcorda on Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 6:28 pm
Stephan, I can't deny that freedom is in great decline in America. I imagine we'll still differ over definitions, but I can relate to your California example. When I was young, my father and I spent a lot of time hiking in New York's beautiful Adirondack Mountains. (Okay, so they're not the Alps, but they're beautiful and I love them.) We hiked all over private, as well as public property. A few places were posted "No Trespassing," a few more, "No Hunting" (but hiking was permitted), but most were left open to (depending on the season) hikers, hunters, snowshoers, cross-country skiers, photographers, and anyone who would respect the land. Such freedom is rare today. For one thing, the owners no longer have assurance that those who cross their land will not trash it or do something illegal on it that will get the owner in trouble. And, as you pointed out, in our litigation-happy society (a recent phenomenon, by the way) even someone who wants to share his land with hikers has to fear a lawsuit from someone who gets hurt. If he doesn't, his insurance company does -- and insurance companies have power.

I'm playing a little loose with definitions here, but so much is a matter of tension between one freedom and another. When my dad and I hiked in the Adirondacks, we were free to drink the water in the streams (and no water ever tasted so good!). But now we're not, because so many people have been free to hike there that the streams have become polluted.

Posted by sursumcorda on Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 7:29 pm
Ah, I yet have much to learn about wisdom from my mother. Sorry I pounced on you, Stephan, instead of really trying to understand your point.

Posted by IrishOboe on Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 7:35 pm
I agree with you, too, Janet, but I'm only able to comment in bits and pieces. More today, I hope. I also hope other people will join in; this is an important topic.

Posted by sursumcorda on Sunday, March 25, 2007 at 6:53 am
Add comment

(Comments may be delayed by moderation.)